As discussed in a previous post, there were oral proceedings before EPO Board 3.3.08 on 13-17 January 2020 in appeal number T 844/18 in one of the so-called “CRISPR cases”. The written decision, which concluded that the patentee did not claim a valid priority, is now online. Henrik Skødt explains the case in this article:
This site is owned by aera a/s, and is for commercial and informational purposes only. The content is not intended as legal advice, and it should not be used as such.
aera a/s will at all times do its utmost to keep this site fully updated. However, aera a/s disclaims any direct or indirect damage resulting from entering this site, or using the information contained in the site.
Material from this site can only be reproduced, distributed, or otherwise made public with prior permission from aera a/s.
